As an artifact of imperial culture, Africanist anthropology is historically
associated with the colonization of Africa in ways that undermine the subd
iscipline's claims of neutrality and objectivity. A critical literature on
the ideological and discursive inventions of Africa by the West challenges
I:he very possibility of Africanist anthropology, to which a variety of res
ponses have emerged. These range from historical reexaminations of imperial
discourses, colonial interactions, and fieldwork in Africa, including dial
ogical engagements with the very production of ethnographic texts, to a mor
e dialectical anthropology of colonial spectacle and culture as it was copr
oduced and reciprocally determined in imperial centers and peripheries. Und
erstood philologically, as an imperial palimpsest in ethnographic writing,
the: colonial legacy in Africanist ethnography can never be negated, but mu
st be acknowledged under the sign of its erasure.