Background: Cognitive behavioral therapy has been shown to be more efficaci
ous than alternative psychosocial interventions for the acute treatment of
adolescents with major depressive disorder. However, the long-term impact o
f brief psychosocial interventions on the course of adolescent depression i
s not well established.
Methods: One hundred seven adolescents with major depressive disorder rando
mly assigned to 12 to 16 weeks of cognitive behavioral therapy, systemic be
havioral family therapy, or nondirective supportive therapy were evaluated
for 2 years after the psychotherapy trial to document the subsequent course
and predictors of major depressive disorder.
Results: There were no long-term differential effects of the 3 psychotherap
ies. Most participants (80%) recovered (median time, 8.2 months from baseli
ne), and 30% had a recurrence (median time, 4.2 months from recovery). Twen
ty-one percent were depressed during at least 80% of the follow-up period.
Severity of depression (at baseline) and presence of self-reported parent-c
hild conflict (at baseline and during the follow-up period) predicted lack
of recovery, chronicity, and recurrence. Despite the similarity to clinical
ly referred patients at baseline, patients recruited via advertisement were
less likely to experience a recurrence.
Conclusions: There were no significant differences in long-term outcome amo
ng cognitive behavioral therapy, systematic behavioral family therapy, and
nondirective supportive therapy. While most participants in this study even
tually recovered, those with severe depression and self-perceived parent-ch
ild conflict are at greater risk for chronic depression and recurrences.