Ta. Emam et al., Effect of intracorporeal-extracorporeal instrument length ratio on endoscopic task performance and surgeon movements, ARCH SURG, 135(1), 2000, pp. 62-65
Hypothesis: Better endoscopic task performance and more ergonomic movements
of a surgeon's dominant upper limb can be achieved within a certain range
of intracorporeal-extracorporeal instrument length ratio.
Design: Investigating the effect of 3 intracorporeal-extratorporeal instrum
ent length ratios (240:120 mm, level 1; 180:180 mm, level 2; and 120:240 mm
, level 3) an efficiency and quality of a standardized endoscopic task (int
racorporeal surgeon's knot). Ten surgeons tied 360 knots inside a trainer i
n a random sequence. Task efficiency was measured by the execution time, wh
ich was recorded for each knot. Task quality was measured by the knot quali
ty score, derived from the force-extension curves obtained by distraction o
f each knot in a tensiometer. Motion analysis parameters were obtained at t
he elbow and shoulder joints using a 3-dimensional motion analysis system (
Kinemetrix Model 5.0-3D/3MBM; Medical Research Ltd, Leeds, England). The Kr
uskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for analysis.
Results: The level 3 ratio had the lon est knot quality score (P = .07) and
longest execution time (P<.05). The range of movement at the elbow was sig
nificantly greater with the level 3 ratio than with the level 1 ratio (P<.0
5). The level 3 ratio also resulted in the widest range of movement at the
shoulder (P<.05 for level 2 vs 3; P = .06 for lever 1 vs 3). The median ang
ular velocity was 329.5 degrees/s, 360 degrees/s, and 530 degrees/s for lev
els 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = .10).
Conclusions: Intracorporeal-extracorporeal instrument length ratio below 1.
0 degrades task performance and is associated with a wider range of movemen
t at the elbow and shoulder and a higher angular velocity at the shoulder.