Mismatch repair, G(2)/M cell cycle arrest and lethality after DNA damage

Citation
G. Aquilina et al., Mismatch repair, G(2)/M cell cycle arrest and lethality after DNA damage, CARCINOGENE, 20(12), 1999, pp. 2317-2325
Citations number
56
Categorie Soggetti
Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
CARCINOGENESIS
ISSN journal
01433334 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
12
Year of publication
1999
Pages
2317 - 2325
Database
ISI
SICI code
0143-3334(199912)20:12<2317:MRGCCA>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
The role of the mismatch repair pathway in DNA replication is well defined but its involvement in processing DNA damage induced by chemical or physica l agents is less clear. DNA repair and cell cycle control are tightly linke d and it has been suggested that mismatch repair is necessary to activate t he G(2)/M checkpoint in the presence of certain types of DNA damage. We inv estigated the proposed role for mismatch repair (MMR) in activation of the G(2)/M checkpoint following exposure to DNA-damaging agents. We compared th e response of MMR-proficient HeLa and Raji cells with isogenic variants def ective in either the hMutL alpha or hMutS alpha complex. Different agents w ere used: the cross-linker N-(2-chloroethyl)-N'-cyclohexyl-N-nitrosourea (C CNU), gamma-radiation and the monofunctional methylating agent N-methyl-N-n itrosourea (MNU), MMR-defective cells are relatively sensitive to CCNU, whi le no differences in survival between repair-proficient and -deficient cell s were observed after exposure to gamma-radiation. Analysis of cell cycle d istribution indicates that G(2) arrest is induced at least as efficiently i n MMR-defective cells after exposure to either CCNU or ionizing radiation. As expected, MNU does not induce G(2) accumulation in MMR-defective cells, which are known to be highly tolerant to killing by methylating agents, ind icating that MNU-induced cell cycle alterations are strictly dependent on t he cytotoxic processing of methylation damage by MMR, Conversely, activatio n of the G(2)/M checkpoint after DNA damage induced by CCNU and gamma-radia tion does not depend on functional MMR. In addition, the absence of a simpl e correlation between the extent of G(2) arrest and cell killing by these a gents suggests that G(2) arrest reflects the processing by MMR of both leth al and non-lethal DNA damage.