Angiographic patterns in in-stent restenosis and implications on subsequent revascularization

Citation
A. Kini et al., Angiographic patterns in in-stent restenosis and implications on subsequent revascularization, CATHET C IN, 49(1), 2000, pp. 23-29
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
ISSN journal
15221946 → ACNP
Volume
49
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
23 - 29
Database
ISI
SICI code
1522-1946(200001)49:1<23:APIIRA>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Stent implantation has become the mainstay of percutaneous revascularizatio n for most coronary lesions; in-stent restenosis (ISR) can occur in 6%-40% of stent procedures and the subsequent response to repeat intervention can possibly be predicted by the angiographic patterns of ISR. This study evalu ated the incidence and predictors of angiographic patterns of ISR and its i mpact on subsequent target lesion revascularization (TLR) in 100 consecutiv e patients having Palmaz-Schatz ISR undergoing intervention. Diffuse ISR (g reater than or equal to 10 mm) was observed in 78% and focal ISR (> 10 mm) in 22%. Diffuse vs. focal ISR occurred earlier after stent implantation and was more common in diabetics. Angiographic predictors of diffuse ISR were stent implantation for a restenotic lesion, long lesions, smaller vessel, s tenting without debulking, and high-pressure balloon inflation (> 16 atm). TLR after repeat intervention was 46% for diffuse and 14% for focal ISR (P < 0.02). Rotational atherectomy resulted in lower TLR (31%) vs. PTCA or res tent (64%) in diffuse ISR (P < 0.004). Therefore, diffuse ISR is more commo n than focal ISR, usually occurs in the setting of aggressive intimal hyper plasia, and can be predicted by clinical and angiographic variables. Also, diffuse intimal hyperplasia within a stent responds poorly to PTCA and may benefit from a more aggressive debulking strategy such as rotational athere ctomy. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.