Reproducibility of indices of axonal excitability in human subjects

Citation
I. Mogyoros et al., Reproducibility of indices of axonal excitability in human subjects, CLIN NEU, 111(1), 2000, pp. 23-28
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
ISSN journal
13882457 → ACNP
Volume
111
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
23 - 28
Database
ISI
SICI code
1388-2457(200001)111:1<23:ROIOAE>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Objectives: Different indices of axonal excitability are now being measured in human subjects, both normal volunteers undergoing some test manoeuvre a nd patients with a variety of peripheral nerve disorders. The reproducibili ty of these indices has not previously been established, and was determined for cutaneous afferents in the median nerve of 12 healthy subjects, using threshold tracking techniques. Methods: Refractoriness and supernormality were determined as the change in stimulus current required to produce a predetermined target potential when conditioned by a supramaximal stimulus at appropriate conditioning-test in tervals. Strength-duration time constant was calculated from the threshold currents using unconditioned test stimuli of 0.1 ms and 1.0 ms. The effects of changes in membrane potential on these indices was assessed by applying subthreshold DC currents (from 50% depolarizing to 50% hyperpolarizing), u sing the reciprocal of threshold (i.e., 'excitability') as an indicator of membrane potential. The intraindividual reproducibility was determined by r epeating the study on each subject up to 10 times. Results: Refractoriness and supernormality were variable between subjects ( mean +/- SD of 31.5 +/- 9.5% and 13.2 +/- 3.8%, respectively) and within su bjects (coefficient of variation 0.2104 and 0.21849, respectively). tau(SD) showed even greater interindividual variability (499.2 +/- 115 mu s) and i ntraindividual variability (coefficient of variation 0.2339). The slopes of relationships between each of the indices and axonal 'excitability' sugges t that refractoriness is extremely sensitive to changes in excitability (0. 9767 +/- 0.1907), tau(SD) less so (0.3766 +/- 0.1322), supernormality least (0.2223 +/- 0.1268). Conclusions: Under controlled conditions, refractoriness is the most sensit ive and least variable of the indices of axonal excitability. However, smal l decreases in temperature greatly increase refractoriness but have little effect on tau(SD). Given that 3 indices reflect different biophysical mecha nisms, nodal and internodal, greater insight into the functional state of p eripheral nerve axons will come when there are coherent changes in all 3 in dices. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.