Fifty-one preschoolers listened to a story and were interviewed about the d
etails by a knowledgeable and a naive interviewer. Half the questions were
straightforward and half were misleading. One-week later, children complete
d a recognition test to measure story memory and a set of theory-of-mind ta
sks to measure reasoning about mental states related to knowing. All childr
en showed a misinformation effect at the initial interview. At the recognit
ion test, a knowledgeable interviewer misled children who passed false-beli
ef tasks more often than a naive interviewer did, Knowledgeable and naive i
nterviewers misled children who failed false-belief tasks equally often. Fa
lse-belief scores predicted the tendency to be misled more often by a knowl
edgeable interviewer relative to a naive interviewer, after controlling for
age and memory when not misled. Elaborated cognitive processing and/ or me
mory source monitoring may mediate the results.