Background and Purpose The scale of stroke impairment characteristics
by Brott and associates, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Strok
e Scale, has been used widely in various studies of stroke outcome; ho
wever, the measurement properties of the items applied to patients dur
ing medical rehabilitation have not been evaluated thoroughly. This st
udy evaluated the extent to which scale items cohere to define a unidi
mensional construct and have a useful range for application to patient
s during medical rehabilitation. Methods Rating scale (or Rasch) analy
sis of the 15 NIH Stroke Scale items was conducted using the BIGSTEPS
computer program to evaluate (1) the ran of impairment assessed by the
items, (2) the items' coherence with an underlying construct of impai
rment, and (3) range of impairment measured in rehabilitation patients
. We sought to maximize the range of impairment measured by conducting
analyses recursively; at each subsequent step, the worst fitting item
was deleted or rescored. The sample comprised 1291 admission and disc
harge records from 693 rehabilitation inpatients with stroke. Results
Thirteen items arrayed the sample across a sufficient range of impairm
ent. The limb ataxia item fit poorly and was deleted; lower ratings fo
r this item were associated with higher scores on the total scale. Pup
illary response was also deleted because ratings reflected poor congru
ence with the total score. Best language was rescored because intermed
iate ratings were inconsistently related to the total score. Patients
with hemorrhagic strokes had poorer fitting measures than did patients
with ischemic strokes. Conclusions The items in a revised NIH Stroke
Scale worked well together to define the severity of impairment result
ing from stroke that is observed during medical rehabilitation. Direct
ions regarding limb ataxia should be modified to indicate untestabilit
y due to hemiplegia.