Cost analysis of a diagnostic screening programme for differentiating type1 and 2 diabetes mellitus in persons aged between 30 and 45 years: a health-economic model for calculating comperative costs
A. Kilburg et al., Cost analysis of a diagnostic screening programme for differentiating type1 and 2 diabetes mellitus in persons aged between 30 and 45 years: a health-economic model for calculating comperative costs, DEUT MED WO, 124(50), 1999, pp. 1510-1517
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background and objective: Because of its chronic course and increasing inci
dence diabetes mellitus is assuming increasing importance not only for medi
cal reasons but also on health policy. Early recognition of carriers of aut
oantibodies among type 2 diabetics (noninsulin-dependent; NIDDM) and the re
sulting optimization of blood glucose could lead to a reduction of secondar
y diseases. A health-economic model for calculating costs was used to test
the socioeconomic significance of a screening programme for identifying car
riers of antibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase among NIDDM diabeti
cs.
Patients and methods: Health-economic analysis was based on the incidence o
f positive autoantibody tests among diabetics aged between 30 and 45 years.
Results for a cohort of diabetics who had been screened were compared with
those obtained in a control group without screening. A time-span of 20 yea
rs was chosen because of the tate manifestations of diseases secondary to D
M. The model calculations used a cost analysis. Data were based on interven
tional clinical and epidemiological studies. Cost of treatment of secondary
diseases was confined to a one-year period. In the first instance the dire
ct medical costs and additionally the indirect economic costs, generated by
patients' loss of production and disability to work were calculated. One-d
imensional sensitivity analysis was used to check the assumptions underlyin
g the model.
Results: Per patient in the model, total costs of the screening programme o
ver a period of 20 years were calculated at DM 31 278, of which DM 7 799 we
re direct and DM 23 479 indirect costs. The calculated costs for the contro
l subjects (no screening) were DM 35 290, of which DM 10 984 were direct an
d DM 24 306 indirect costs.
Conclusions: Extrapolating to the entire population, with an investment by
the statuatory health insurances of ca. DM 22.8 million, employing a full s
creening programme would lead to a saving of DM 2.6 billion.