The use of client surrogates in determining the reliability of a standardized assessment instrument in multiple, diverse settings

Citation
Cp. Peters et al., The use of client surrogates in determining the reliability of a standardized assessment instrument in multiple, diverse settings, EVAL PROG P, 22(4), 1999, pp. 429-437
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Social Work & Social Policy
Journal title
EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING
ISSN journal
01497189 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
429 - 437
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-7189(199911)22:4<429:TUOCSI>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Since its introduction in 1980, the widely-used Addiction Severity Index ha s been subjected to extensive validity and reliability studies. Reliability procedures have commonly entailed test-retest and multiple judge video rev iews, all within controlled environments. The following study uses a method that differs substantially from conventional reliability assessment by emp loying trained, professional actors as client surrogates to examine the rel iability of the instrument when administered in the field, in naturalistic, diverse agency settings. This article details this method, addressing the question, to what extent did this method produce consistent stimuli to enab le the measurement of reliability? (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All right s reserved.