Allothetic and idiothetic navigation strategies rely on very different cues
and computational procedures. Allothetic navigation uses the relationships
between external cues (visual, auditory, and olfactory) and mapping or geo
metrical calculations to locate places. Idiothetic navigation relies on cue
s generated by self-movement (proprioceptive cues or cues from optic, audit
ory, and olfactory flow, or efference copy of motor commands) and path inte
gration to locate a present location and/or a starting point. Whereas it is
theorized that exploratory behavior is used by animals to create a central
representation of allothetic cues, it is unclear whether exploration plays
a role in idiothetic navigation. Computational models suggest that either
a reference frame, calibrated by exploration, or vector addition, without r
eference to exploration, could support path integration. The present study
evaluated the contribution of exploration in these navigation strategies by
comparing its contribution to the solution of both allothetic and idiothet
ic navigation problems. in two experiments, rats were trained to forage on
an open table for large food pellets, which they then carried to a refuge t
o eat. Once trained, they were given probe trials from novel locations in e
ither normal light, which permits the use of allothetic cues, or in infrare
d light, which requires the use of idiothetic cues. When faced with a new p
roblem in either lighting condition, the rats first explored the foraging t
able before navigating directly home with the food. That exploration is equ
ally important for allothetic and idiothetic navigation, suggests that both
navigation strategies require a calibrated representation of the environme
nt. (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.