A comparative study of fibrous dysplasia and osteofibrous dysplasia with regard to expressions of c-fos and c-jun products and bone matrix proteins: A clinicopathologic review and immunohistochemical study of c-fos, c-jun, type I collagen, osteonectin, osteopontin, and osteocalcin
Citation
A. Sakamoto et al., A comparative study of fibrous dysplasia and osteofibrous dysplasia with regard to expressions of c-fos and c-jun products and bone matrix proteins: A clinicopathologic review and immunohistochemical study of c-fos, c-jun, type I collagen, osteonectin, osteopontin, and osteocalcin, HUMAN PATH, 30(12), 1999, pp. 1418-1426
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
HUMAN PATHOLOGY
SICI code
0046-8177(199912)30:12<1418:ACSOFD>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Fibrous dysplasia and osteofibrous dysplasia are both benign fibro-osseous
lesions of the bone and are generally seen during childhood or adolescence.
Histologically, the features of these bone lesions sometimes look quite si
milar, but their precise nature remains controversial. We retrospectively s
tudied clinicopathologic findings in 62 cases of fibrous dysplasia and 20 c
ases of osteofibrous dysplasia with regard to their anatomic location and h
istological appearance. From among these cases, the immunohistochemical exp
ressions of c-fos and c-jun proto-oncogene products and bone matrix protein
s: of type I collagen, osteonectin, osteopontin, and osteocalcin were evalu
ated in 20 typical fibrous dysplasias and 17 osteofibrous dysplasias using
paraffin sections, and these expressions were then assessed semiquantitativ
ely. Microscopically, fibrous dysplasia showed various secondary changes, s
uch as hyalinization, hemorrhage, xanthomatous reaction, and cystic change
in 22 of the 62 cases (35%). This was a higher incidence than in osteofibro
us dysplasia, in which only 2 of the 20 cases (10%) showed such changes. In
the elderly fibrous dysplasia cases, the cellularity of fibroblast-like ce
lls was rather low, and those cases were hyalinized. Almost all of the case
s of fibrous dysplasia and osteofibrous dysplasia showed positive expressio
ns of c-fos and c-jun products. The expressions of type I collagen and oste
opontin showed no difference between fibrous dysplasia and osteofibrous dys
plasia. Immunoreactivity for osteonectin in bone matrix was detected in onl
y 1 case of fibrous dysplasia (1 of 20), whereas it was recognized in 14 of
the 17 cases of osteofibrous dysplasia. Furthermore, the immunoreactivity
for osteocalcin in bone matric and fibroblast-like cells was higher in fibr
ous dysplasia than it was in osteofibrous dysplasia, semiquantitatively. Ou
r immunohistochemical results regarding osteonectin and osteocalcin suggest
that the bone matrix of fibrous dysplasia is somewhat more mature than tha
t of osteofibrous dysplasia, and that the fibroblast-like cells in fibrous
dysplasia share some phenotypic features with osteoprogenitor cells of norm
al osteogenic tissues. Fibrous dysplasia and osteofibrous dysplasia share s
ome similar histological features, including c-fos and c-jun expressions, a
lthough different clinicohistologic features and immunohistochemical expres
sions of osteonectin and osteocalcin were observed. These features suggest
that the mechanisms behind the development of fibrous dysplasia and osteofi
brous dysplasia are similar, but this is not necessarily indicative of a cl
oser relationship between the 2 diseases. Copyright (C) 1999 by W.B. Saunde
rs Company.