Rating accuracy is proposed to consist of 2 components: internal and extern
al accuracy. Internal accuracy is identified as the appropriate basis for e
valuating the impact of rating methodology on rating accuracy. Improved ind
exes of accuracy were used to study the internal accuracy of distributional
assessment (DA). DA achieved moderate to high internal accuracy levels in
reproducing the entire profiles, means, and standard deviations of true dis
tributions. It also proved to be significantly more internally accurate tha
n a conventional Likert-type rating scale in estimating distributional mean
s. DA proved to be particularly accurate when ratings were elicited in the
form of raw count estimates of frequencies obtained under short recall dela
y conditions. Correlational findings suggested that different cognitive pro
cesses and/or memory sources may underlie assessments obtained via distribu
tional and conventional rating methods.