Ma. Quigley et al., Diagnostic accuracy of physician review, expert algorithms and data-derived algorithms in adult verbal autopsies, INT J EPID, 28(6), 1999, pp. 1081-1087
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Background The verbal autopsy (VA) is used to collect information on cause-
specific mortality from bereaved relatives. A cause of death may be assigne
d by physician review of the questionnaires, or by an algorithm. We compare
d the diagnostic accuracy of physician review, an expert algorithm, and dat
a-derived algorithms.
Methods Data were drawn from a multicentre validation study of 796 adult de
aths that occurred in hospitals in Tanzania, Ethiopia, and Ghana. A 'gold s
tandard' cause of death was assigned using hospital records and death certi
ficates. The VA interviews were carried out by trained fieldworkers 1-21 mo
nths after the subject's death. A cause of death was assigned by physician
review and an expert algorithm. Data-derived algorithms that most accuratel
y estimated the cause-specific mortality fraction (CSMF) for each cause of
death were identified using logistic regression.
Results The most common causes of death were tuberculosis/AIDS (CSMF = 18.6
%), malaria (CSMF = 10.7%), meningitis (CSMF = 8.3%), and cardiovascular di
sorders (CSMF = 8.2%). The CSMF obtained using physician review was within
+/-20% of the gold standard value for 12 causes of death including the four
common causes. The CSMF obtained using the expert algorithm was within +/-
20% of the gold standard for eight causes of death, including tuberculosis/
AIDS, malaria, and meningitis. The CSMF obtained using the data-derived alg
orithms was within +/-20% of the gold standard for seven causes of death, i
ncluding tuberculosis/AIDS, meningitis, and cardiovascular disorders. All t
hree methods yielded a specificity of at least 80% for all causes of death,
and a sensitivity of at least 80% for deaths due to injuries and rabies.
Conclusions For those settings where physician review is not feasible, expe
rt and data-derived algorithms provide an alternative approach for assignin
g many causes of death. We recommend that the algorithms proposed herein ar
e validated further.