T. Degroot et Sj. Motowidlo, Why visual and vocal interview cues can affect interviewers' judgments andpredict job performance, J APPL PSYC, 84(6), 1999, pp. 986-993
Using videotaped interviews with 60 managers in utility companies, the auth
ors found that a composite of vocal interview cues (pitch, pitch variabilit
y, speech rate, pauses, and amplitude variability) correlated with supervis
ory ratings of job performance (r = .18, p < .05). Using videotaped intervi
ews with 110 managers in a news-publishing company, the authors found that
the same composite of vocal cues correlated with performance ratings (r = .
20, p < .05) and with interviewers' judgments (r = .20, p < .05) and that a
composite of visual cues (physical attractiveness, smiling, gaze, hand mov
ement, and body orientation) correlated with performance ratings (r = .14,
p < .07) and with interviewers' judgments (r = .21, p < .05). Results of te
sts of mediation effects indicate that personal reactions such as liking, t
rust, and attributed credibility toward interviewees explain relationships
(a) between job performance and vocal cues and (b) between interviewers' ju
dgments and both visual and vocal cues.