M. Gil-agusti et al., Comparison of the performance of butanol and pentanol as modifiers in the micellar chromatographic determination of some phenethylamines, J CHROMAT A, 866(1), 2000, pp. 35-49
A procedure was developed for the determination of several phenethylamines
(amphetamine, arterenol, ephedrine, phenylephrine, phenylpropanolamine, mep
hentermine, methoxyphenamine, pseudoephedrine and tyramine), using micellar
mobile phases of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), a C-18 column and UV detect
ion. The drugs were eluted at short retention times with conventional aceto
nitrile-water or methanol-water mobile phases. In contrast, in the micellar
system, they were strongly retained due to association with the surfactant
adsorbed on the stationary phase, and needed the addition of butanol or pe
ntanol to be eluted from the column. These modifiers allowed a simple way o
f controlling the retention. The chromatographic efficiencies obtained with
the hybrid mobile phases of SDS-butanol and SDS-pentanol were also very hi
gh, mostly in the N=3000-7000 range, significantly greater than those achie
ved with a conventional acetonitrile-methanol-water mobile phase. Butanol a
nd pentanol yielded similar selectivities, but the latter modifier permitte
d significantly shorter retention times than butanol, and was preferred to
expedite the analysis of the pharmaceuticals. Most binary combinations of t
he nine phenethylamines can be resolved with these mobile phases. A mobile
phase of 0.15 M SDS-5% pentanol was used to assay five of the phenethylamin
es (amphetamine, ephedrine, phenylephrine, phenylpropanolamine and pseudoep
hedrine) in 22 pharmaceutical preparations, which contained diverse accompa
nying compounds. The results agreed with the declared compositions and with
those obtained with a mobile phase of methanol-acetonitrile-0.05 M phospha
te buffer (pH 3) 10:5:85, with no interferences and relative errors usually
below 2%. However, with the aqueous-organic mobile phase, the retention ti
me for phenylephrine was too low and could not be usually evaluated. (C) 20
00 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.