Optimal volume of processed plasma and total number of selective plasmapheresis sessions in the treatment of patients with severe generalized myasthenia gravis
Jh. Yeh et Hc. Chiu, Optimal volume of processed plasma and total number of selective plasmapheresis sessions in the treatment of patients with severe generalized myasthenia gravis, J CLIN APH, 14(4), 1999, pp. 177-180
The selection of the technical parameters of plasmapheresis in the treatmen
t of patients with MG varies widely due to the lack of sufficient data from
controlled studies to standardize the plasmapheresis procedure. Eight myas
thenia gravis (MG) patients (Osserman IIb, and III) received either immunoa
dsorption plasmapheresis (IA) with a TM-TR 350 (Asahi Medical Co., Tokyo, J
apan) or double filtration plasmapheresis (DF) with a Cascadeflo AC-1770, w
ith four in each group. A Plasmaflo AP 05 W (Asahi Medical Co., Tokyo, Japa
n) was used as the plasma separator in both groups. Each course of treatmen
t consisted of five sessions of aphereses on alternate days. Plasma was sam
pled before and after passing through the column. Samples of plasma were an
alyzed for acetylcholine receptor antibody (AchRAb) at the start of plasmap
heresis and sequentially after every 0.5 L of plasma treated. The IA method
cleared significantly more AchRAb during the initial treatment of 1.5 L of
plasma than the DF method, especially in the initial I L (P < 0.01). The c
olumn saturated after treatment of 1.5 to 2 L of plasma. It is known that o
ver-saturation of column may release the already adsorbed/filtrated antibod
ies. Longitudinal analysis on the serological changes during the five sessi
ons revealed that the clearance obtained using the IA method was significan
tly higher and more sustained after the first session of treatment compared
to the DF method (P < 0.05). The titers of AchRAb were also noted to rise
after the fourth session. These results suggest that 2 L of processed volum
e is optimal in terms of the functional capacity of a plasmapheresis column
in either IA or DF methods, and that a total of four sessions of treatment
in one course may provide optimal elimination of AchRAb. I. Clin. Apheresi
s 14: 177-180, 1999. (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.