Randomized trial of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim after myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the harvesting of peripheral-blood stem cells
Ch. Weaver et al., Randomized trial of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim after myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the harvesting of peripheral-blood stem cells, J CL ONCOL, 18(1), 2000, pp. 43-53
Purpose: The purpose of this study wets to compare the effects of filgrasti
m, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim on CD34(+) cell
yields and morbidity alter myelosuppressive mobilization chemotherapy (MC).
Patients and Methods: One hundred fifty-six patients were randomized to rec
eive filgrastim (n = 51), sargramostim (n = 52), or sargramostim for 5 days
followed by filgrastim (n = 53) after MC with either cyclophosphamide and
etoposide (n = 75) or paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (n = 81).
Results: Compared with those who received sargramostim, patients who receiv
ed filgrastim had faster recovery of an absolute neutrophil count of 0.5 x
10(9)/L or greater (a median of 11 v 14 days; P = .0001), with fewer patien
ts requiring RBC transfusions (P = .008), fewer patients with fever (18% v
52%; P = 0.001), fewer hospital admissions (20% v 42%; P = .013), and less
intravenous antibiotic therapy (24% v 69%; P = .001). patients who received
filgrastim yielded more CD34(+) cells (median, 7.1 v 2.0 x 10(6)/kg/aphere
sis; P = .0001), and a higher fraction achieved 2.5 x 10(6) (94% v 78%; P =
.021) and 5 x 10(6) (88% v 53%; P = .001) or more CD34(+) cells/kg with fe
wer aphereses (median, 2 v 3; P = .002) and fewer days of growth-factor tre
atment (median, 12 v 14; P = .0001). There were no major differences in out
comes between the filgrastim alone and the sequential regimens. After high-
dose chemotherapy, patients who had peripheral-blood stem cells (PBSCs) mob
ilized with filgrastim or the sequential regimen received higher numbers of
CD34+ cells and had faster platelet recovery (P = .015), with fewer patien
ts (P = .014) receiving fewer platelet transfusions (P = .001) than patient
s receiving sargramostim-mobilized PBSCs.
Conclusion: It was concluded that filgrastim alone or sequential sargramost
im and filgrastim were superior to sargramostim alone for the mobilization
of CD34(+) cells and reduction of toxicities after MC. (C) 2000 by American
Society of Clinical Oncology.