Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the clinical performa
nce of a direct placement gallium alloy sealed with an established dentine
adhesive system. In addition, microanalysis of a few gallium restorations t
hat failed in clinical service was performed. Clinical factors such as pulp
al sensitivity, fracture of the restoration and of the tooth, marginal dete
rioration, and tarnish were assessed.
Methods: Sixty-ive restorations of Galley and 62 of Tytin (49 and 51 Class
II restorations, respectively) were placed according to a predetermined sch
eme for randomisation in 37 patients by two operators using rubber dam isol
ation. For the Galley restorations, the enamel and dentine were etched, and
then sealed with PAAMA 2 dentine adhesive according to the manufacturer's
instructions. After carving, PAAMA 2 was applied to the Galley and light-cu
red. Cavity preparations for Tytin received no adhesive sealer. All restora
tions were polished at least 24 h post-operatively. Microstructural analysi
s of retrieved fragments of failed restorations was conducted using electro
n probe microanalysis.
Results: At 1 year, only one Tytin restoration was found to have failed due
to an isthmus fracture. The remaining restorations of Tytin were intact wi
th no reported sensitivity. Of the 65 Galley restorations placed, 28 had to
be removed, including restorations in teeth, which were symptomatic, non-v
ital and/or fractured, and teeth with fractured restorations. Tarnish was p
resent on many of the Galley restorations. Retrieved fragments of failed Ga
lley restorations exhibited a dark surface at the pulpal wall interface and
small cracks were observed in that surface. Internal cracks and extensive
corrosion was observed using the microprobe. Gallium oxides and chlorides w
ere identified as the predominant corrosion products.
Conclusions: The gallium alloy, Galley, sealed with PAAMA 2 dentine adhesiv
e system demonstrated a high clinical failure rate. (C) 2000 Elsevier Scien
ce Ltd. All rights reserved.