This study addresses 3 questions: How flexible are readers when reading str
ategically? How is strategic processing affected by properties of the text?
and Do some strategies lead to better text retention than others? Particip
ants read short narratives and thought aloud with an instruction to either
explain, predict, associate, or understand. The think-aloud protocols were
used to predict sentence reading times for other participants who read sile
ntly with the same strategies. The results indicated that readers are capab
le of strategically controlling the inferences that they generate. However,
strategic control comes at some cost in that it limits the resources devot
ed to other inferences. Furthermore, strategic processing is heavily constr
ained by a text. Text-based explanations occurred when there was an identif
iable causal antecedent in the prior text. Knowledge-based inferences occur
red when there were no antecedents and when new characters and objects were
introduced. These effects occurred across reading strategies. Reading to e
xplain led to better memory, but only when reading silently.