The author used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to model self-regulation
subprocesses as latent concepts in an examination of the effectiveness of
peer modeling for teaching self-regulation. The design was a nonequivalent
pretest-posttest control group design with 63 participants (52 women and 11
men). The experimental group received self-regulation training through a s
elf-regulation videotape and a peer-advocated action plan. The control grou
p received no training. Difference scores were calculated for both groups a
nd analyzed with analysis of variance. The author used a 50-item Likert-typ
e Self-Regulation Inventory (SRI) as a pretest and posttest to measure part
icipants' self-regulatory attitudes and behaviors. The experimental group p
erformed significantly better than the control group. The author used CFA t
o test the goodness of fit between a hypothesized model of self-regulation
and the sample data. On the basis of a priori specification of the CFA mode
l, the author predicted that responses to the SRI could be explained by 7 I
st-order factors (Help-Seeking, Study Strategies, Self-Motivation, Self-Eva
luation, Self-Efficacy, Managing Distractions, and Self-Monitoring) and 1 2
nd-order factor of Self-Regulation. The results of the CFA indicated adequa
te goodness of fit.