For most of the past decade, there have been rumblings in the NRC membershi
p around the question: Should NRC be involved in attempting to influence ed
ucational policy making? This question has been posed at Town Meetings, in
campaign statements, committee reports, conference forums, symposia, and pa
pers. II has been debated at board meetings, Vital Issues, and in NRC publi
cations. The debate continues, but that debate often seems grounded in one
or more unwarranted assumptions. In this article, some of those assumptions
are challenged, primarily through the use of descriptive case studies of e
ducational policy making in two states - Texas and California.