This paper presents a dynamic model of acquisition strategy and applies it
to the case history of a large engineering firm. The paper uses the notion
of 'dominant logic' first put forward by Prahalad and Bettis (1986) to expl
ain how the firm's acquisition strategy and management approach evolved. It
is suggested that the core activities and history of the firm led to the d
evelopment of a management approach that emphasized individual autonomy and
development, ad hoc structural arrangements, a short-term focus, and flexi
bility and opportunism. These characteristics persisted over time and tende
d to inhibit both commitment to intended strategies and extension of core c
ompetencies. At the same time, this logic encouraged opportunistic acquisit
ions which snowballed into a major new strategic thrust. It is concluded: (
a) the firm's 'dominant logic' rooted in core activities and in the history
of a firm can be used to explain its acquisition management behaviour; (b)
the more malleable elements of a dominant logic can be somewhat extended u
nder the thrust of key managers, but permanent change will not occur as lon
g as these shifts conflict with more immutable elements; (c) in a process o
f growth by acquisition, a firm will tend to preserve its unique dominant l
ogic until the inconsistencies it creates are revealed in a crisis or serie
s of crises. One mode of adjustment may then be to operate under more than
one dominant logic to accommodate the firm's heterogeneity.