Aa. Artru et Y. Momota, Rate of CSF formation and resistance to reabsorption of CSF during sevoflurane or remifentanil in rabbits, J NEUROS AN, 12(1), 2000, pp. 37-43
Information on the effects of sevoflurane on the rate of cerebrospinal flui
d (CSF) formation (Vf) and resistance to reabsorption of CSF (Ra) is incomp
lete, and no such information is available for remifentanil. The present st
udy examined the dose-related effects of sevoflurane and remifentanil on Vf
and Ra in rabbits. Eight rabbits were studied during isoflurane 1.4% (base
line) and sevoflurane 1.4%, 2.5%, and 3.7%, and eight were studied during i
soflurane 1.4% (baseline) and remifentanil 0.30, 0.67, and 1.00 mu g . kg(-
1) . min(-1) in randomized order. Ventriculocisternal perfusion at two CSF
pressure states for each experimental condition was used to determine Vf an
d Ra. There was no dose-response relation for Vf (10.4 +/- 2.5, 9.0 +/- 2.0
, and 10.0 +/- 3.0 mu l . min(-1)) or Ra (0.81 +/- 0.33, 1.35 +/- 0.54, and
0.84 +/- 0.27 cm H2O . mu l(-1) . min) between the three sevoflurane conce
ntrations. There also was no dose-response relation for Vf (7.8 +/- 1.2, 8.
8 +/- 3.0, and 6.5 +/- 2.3 mu l . min(-1)) or Ra (1.07 +/- 0.54, 1.23 +/- 0
.50, and 1.13 +/- 0.51 cm H2O . mu l(-1) . min) between the three remifenta
nil doses. Vf and Ra during either sevoflurane or remifentanil were not sig
nificantly different from Vf and Ra during the two isoflurane baseline cond
itions (Vf = 8.5 +/- 2.5 and 9.8 +/- 1.3 mu l . min(-1), and Ra = 0.97 +/-
0.36 and 1.38 +/- 0.55 cm H2O . mu l(-1) . min, mean +/- SD). Vf and Ra are
of interest because they influence CSF volume, intracranial pressure, and/
or intracranial elastance. In our model, sevoflurane or remifentanil did no
t significantly alter Vf or Ra.