Objectives: To examine the biomechanical stability of three constructs curr
ently used for the management of three-part proximal humerus fractures. Ten
sion band wires (TBW) with supplemental Enders nails, modified cloverleaf p
late and screws, and intramedullary (IM) nailing with proximal and distal i
nterlocks were tested to determine relative stability.
Design: A reproducible three-part fracture was made in fresh-frozen strippe
d proximal humeri. The fracture was stabilized using TBW/Enders nail (n = 6
), plate/screws (n = 5), or IM nailing (n = 5).
Main Outcome Measurements: Mechanical testing was performed with a small pr
eload followed by deflection of five millimeters at a rate of one millimete
r per second in flexion, extension, and varus and valgus relative to the hu
meral shaft. A load-displacement curve was obtained. Torsional testing was
performed in internal and external rotation, and torque-rotation curves wer
e recorded.
Results: In cantilever bending, the plate/screws construct and the IM nail
construct were superior to the TBW/Enders nail construct for all parameters
except extension. There was no statistically significant difference betwee
n the IM nail and the plate/screws groups. Torsional stiffness testing reve
aled that the plate/screws and the IM nail were superior to the TBW/Enders
nail construct. There was no statistical difference between the IM nail and
the plate/screws groups.
Conclusions: In a cadaveric model of three-part proximal humerus fractures
stripped of soft tissue, plate/screws fixation and IM nailing provide great
er torsional and bending stiffness than does fixation with TBW/Enders nail.
There was no statistically significant difference in torsional or bending
stiffness between IM nailing with interlocks and plate/screws fixation in t
his model.