Effect of stimulation of endogenous melatonin secretion during constant light exposure on 6-sulphatoxymelatonin rhythmicity in rats

Citation
Dj. Kennaway et Sa. Rowe, Effect of stimulation of endogenous melatonin secretion during constant light exposure on 6-sulphatoxymelatonin rhythmicity in rats, J PINEAL R, 28(1), 2000, pp. 16-25
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PINEAL RESEARCH
ISSN journal
07423098 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
16 - 25
Database
ISI
SICI code
0742-3098(200001)28:1<16:EOSOEM>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
When light is presented unexpectedly at night to rats, melatonin production and secretion is acutely inhibited and the time of onset of production on the subsequent night is altered. In a series of experiments, we examined th e effects of 6-12 hr light (200 lux) at night on melatonin metabolite excre tion (6-sulphatoxymelatonin, aMT.6S). During the light exposure, we adminis tered isoproterenol to stimulate endogenous production of melatonin by the pineal gland to determine if replacement of melatonin would block any phase shifting effects of the light. Exposure to 6 hr of light either during the first or second half of the night suppressed aMT.6S excretion during the l ight treatment and delayed the onset of melatonin secretion by 3.7 +/- 0.6 and 2.5 +/- 0.6 hr, respectively, compared to a change of 0.5 +/- 0.1 hr in animals maintained in darkness. Twelve hours light exposure (i.e. one nigh t of continuous light) suppressed aMT.6S excretion completely and resulted in a delay in the onset the next night of 2.1 +/- 0.7 hr. When propranolol (10 mg/kg) was administered at 2-hr intervals during darkness, aMT.6S excre tion was suppressed throughout the night, but on the subsequent release int o constant darkness the onset of excretion was not delayed (0.6 +/- 0.1 hr delay). Administration of isoproterenol (10 mg/kg) to animals in constant l ight, at the time of expected lights off(CT12), and 5 hr later (CT17) resul ted in an increase in melatonin production and aMT.6S excretion that was si milar in duration and amount to the control night. The stimulation of endog enous melatonin production failed to block the phase shifting effects of th e light exposure and, in fact, appeared to potentiate the delay at least on the first night(4.2 +/- 0.9 hr). The timing of the release into constant d arkness following the light treatment had an unexpected effect on melatonin production on the cycle after treatment. Thus, animals exposed to 12 hr li ght and released into darkness at the normal time of lights off as above ha d a delay of about 2 hr and excreted 71 +/- 18% of the aMT.6S excreted on a control night. Animals released into darkness at the expected time of ligh ts on failed to excrete more than 20 pmol/hr (i.e. no onset of excretion co uld be determined) at any time on the first subjective night after light tr eatment, which was no different from the excretion during the light treatme nt. On the next subjective night, the onset was delayed as expected and the amount of aMT.6S produced was restored. Treatment with isoproterenol at CT 12 and CT17 failed to affect either the amount of aMT.6S excreted on the fi rst subjective night after light treatment or the phase delay on the second night after treatment. The failure to produce melatonin on the first subje ctive night after 12 hr light exposure and release into darkness at CTO was not due to failure at the level of the pineal gland since injection of iso proterenol at CT12 and CT17 on the first subjective night after light resto red the normal amount of melatonin production. These results suggest that t he absence of melatonin during light stimulation at night is not responsibl e for the phase delay in melatonin production and excretion on subsequent n ights. The basis of the failure of the rats to commence melatonin productio n following 12 hr extended light exposure followed immediately by continuou s darkness is not known.