Commentary - Who contracts for primary care?

Citation
R. Lewis et al., Commentary - Who contracts for primary care?, J PUBL H M, 21(4), 1999, pp. 367-371
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE
ISSN journal
09574832 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
367 - 371
Database
ISI
SICI code
0957-4832(199912)21:4<367:C-WCFP>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
The implications of the 1997 NHS (Primary Care) Act have been largely overl ooked in the rush to establish Primary Care Groups. Allowing health authori ties to develop local contracts for primary care has far-reaching implicati ons and is an important departure from the national system of negotiation t hat has characterized general practice to date. This paper describes a cont ent analysis of a sample of Personal Medical Services (PMS) pilot contracts . In the first year little attention has been given to achieving cost savin gs or greater efficiency and few contracts promote clinical guidelines. The difficulties of specifying services sensitive to local health needs are hi ghlighted and the national Statement of Fees and Allowances (the 'Red Book' ) may not be swiftly supplanted. However, the pilots have introduced innova tions such as salaried general practitioners, nurse-led services and NHS tr ust-managed care. The development of local contracts provides a valuable le arning experience for general practitioners and health authorities in advan ce of the establishment of Primary Care Trusts.