'Failure to rescue' as a measure of quality of hospital care: the limitations of secondary diagnosis coding in English hospital data

Citation
M. Mckee et al., 'Failure to rescue' as a measure of quality of hospital care: the limitations of secondary diagnosis coding in English hospital data, J PUBL H M, 21(4), 1999, pp. 453-458
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE
ISSN journal
09574832 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
453 - 458
Database
ISI
SICI code
0957-4832(199912)21:4<453:'TRAAM>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Although it is widely recognized that quality of care varies between hospit als, a robust and valid measure of outcome that can be used in comparisons has proven elusive. One measure that has recently been proposed by US resea rchers is the 'failure to rescue' (FTR) rate. This is based on the assumpti on that, whereas complications may reflect both patient severity and health care factors, the ability to save patients once complications arise is muc h more closely related to the quality of health care. We describe an evalua tion of FTR in a national sample of English hospitals using hospital episod e data. We found that the rate of secondary diagnosis recording in England is about one-tenth that in the United States. The FTR rate would be highly sensitive to variations in the completeness of coding of secondary diagnose s, Unless coding is of uniformly high quality, any attempt to compare sever ity adjusted outcomes will be potentially unreliable.