If the much discussed fragmentation of the West means that we can seldom ho
ld constructive moral conversations with our near neighbors, why imagine th
at comparative ethics is feasible as a critical enterprise with a coherent
method? How, more specifically, do we understand the relative merits of nat
uralism, formalism, and supernaturalism as ethical orientations? The author
addresses these questions first by examining the meaning of the quoted ter
ms, then by criticizing the inordinate optimism of most naturalisms and for
malisms. The article ends by briefly elaborating and defending a supernatur
alist conception of Christian love. As a fruit of the Spirit, agape leaves
one neither heteronomous nor autonomous, but holy. Such holiness can move o
ne to appreciate, judiciously, cultures different from one's own.