The molecular support for the recently postulated hypothesis `Ecdysozoa' is
re-examined. Some ISS rDNA-alignments clearly contain a pattern of charact
er states that cause tree building methods to identify a clade comprised of
arthropods and Cycloneuralia. However, examination of these alignments sho
ws that the supporting positions are very noisy, with the consequence that
this weakens the hierarchical structure of these data sets. This noisy feat
ure of the data is reflected in lowered bootstrap values on reconstructed t
rees, the shape of relative apparent synapomorphy analyses (RASA) plots as
weil as in PHYSID and Hadamard spectra which show strong contradictory sign
als. The unexplained nature of the contradictions in the 18S rDNA leads us
to be cautious in accepting the Ecdysozoa hypothesis, particularly since a
strong argument for the alternative hypothesis Articulata can be rr,ade fro
m morphological data.