The special semantic characteristics of bare nominals (nonspecificity and l
ack of scopal interactions) are best explained in terms of an approach that
views these not as full DPs, but as minimal nominal projections containing
an internal pro argument. The evidence from child language suggests that s
uch aspects of the interpretation of bare nominals are readily accessible i
n children's grammar. Thirty-six English-speaking children participated in
a controlled comprehension study comparing their interpretation of sentence
s with quantifiers involving both the bare noun construction and full DPs.
Children seemed to readily understand the interpretive differences between
the two structures, suggesting that the presence or absence of a determiner
is a sufficient trigger for the acquisition of such construction.