Objective: This study examined the impact of managed care on hospital obste
tric outcomes in Medicaid-sponsored women.
Methods: The study sample consisted of a total of 525,517 maternal deliveri
es for singleton births from three payer groups, Medicaid managed care, Med
icaid fee-for-service, and private managed care in 439 short-term-stay nonf
ederal hospitals in California and Florida. Quality of care comparisons wer
e made using six indicators. Data were derived from linked computer files o
f birth certificates, hospital discharge abstracts, Medicaid eligibility re
cords, Medicaid health care claims, and surveys of hospital characteristics
.
Results: The overall multivariate likelihood of an adverse maternal outcome
during hospitalization for a delivery was not significantly different betw
een Medicaid managed care and Medicaid fee-for-service groups in California
and Florida. However, mothers in the Medicaid managed care group compared
with mothers in the private managed care group experienced a higher likelih
ood of eclampsia (California) (adjusted odds ratio = 1.26; 95% confidence i
nterval 1.05, 1.57; P=.04).
Conclusion: Overall, managed care has not adversely affected pregnancy outc
omes in Medicaid-sponsored women. Yet, payer system changes may be insuffic
ient to achieve complete parity of outcomes relative to private managed car
e patients. (Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:6-13. (C) 2000 by The American College
of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).