Purpose: To describe the pharmacokinetic behaviour and practical aspec
ts of low (0.5-1 l.min(-1)) and minimal (0.25-0.5 l.min(-1)) flow anae
sthesia. Methods: A Medline search located articles on low flow anaest
hesia, and computer simulated anaesthetic uptake models are used. Prin
cipal findings: Most, 85-90%, of anaesthetists use high fresh gas flow
rates during inhalational anaesthesia. Low/minimal flow anaesthesia w
ith a circle circuit may avoid the need for in-circuit humidifiers, ra
ise the temperature of inspired gases by up to 6 degrees C, reduce cos
t by about 25% by reduction of fresh gas flows to 1.5 l.min(-1) and re
duce environmental pollution with scavenged gas. Knowledge of volatile
anaesthetic pharmacokinetic behaviour facilitates the use of minimal/
low flow rates, Small amounts of nitrogen or minute amounts of methane
, acetone, carbon monoxide, and inert gases in the circuit are of no c
oncern, but the degradation of desflurane (to carbon monoxide by dry a
bsorbent) and sevoflurane (to compound A by using a fresh gas flow of
> 2 l.min(-1)) must be avoided. With modem gas monitoring technology,
safety should be no more of a concern than with high flow techniques.
Conclusion: The use of fresh gas flow rates of < 1 l.min(-1) for maint
enance of anaesthesia has many advantages, and should be encouraged fo
r inhalational anaesthesia with most modern volatile anaesthetics.