Mk. Viaene et al., Neurobehavioural effects of occupational exposure to cadmium: a cross sectional epidemiological study, OCC ENVIR M, 57(1), 2000, pp. 19-27
Citations number
62
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Pharmacology & Toxicology
Background-A patient with unexplained minor behavioural changes associated
with an axonal sensorimotor polyneuropathy had a history of chronic occupat
ional exposure to cadmium (Cd). Although animal studies have shown that Cd
is a potent neurotoxicant, Little is known about its toxicity for the human
central nervous system. The aim of this study was to investigate the toxic
potential of chronic occupational exposure to Cd on neurobehavioural funct
ions.
Methods-A cross sectional epidemiological study was conducted in a group of
Cd workers and an age matched control group. Eighty nine adult men (42 exp
osed to Cd and 47 control workers) were given a blinded standardised examin
ation that consisted of computer assisted neurobehavioural tests (neurobeha
vioural examination system), a validated questionnaire to assess neurotoxic
complaints (neurotoxicity symptom checklist-60, NSC-60), and a standardise
d self administered questionnaire to detect complaints consistent with peri
pheral neuropathy and dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system. Historic
al and current data on biomonitoring of exposure to Cd, either the highest
value of Cd in urine (CdU in mu g Cd/g creatinine) of each Cd worker during
work (CdUmax) or the current value (CdU-(current)) of each control, were a
vailable as well as data on microproteinuria.
Results-Cd workers (CdUmax: mean (range), 12.6 (0.4-38.4)) performed worse
than the controls (CdUcurrent: mean (range), 0.7 (0.1-2.0)) on visuomotor t
asks, symbol digit substitution (p=0.008), and simple reaction time to dire
ction (p=0.058) or location (p=0.042) of a stimulus. In multiple Linear reg
ression analysis, symbol digit substitution, simple direction reaction time
test, and simple location reaction time test were significantly related to
CdUmax, (beta=0.35 (p<0.001), beta= 0.25 (p=0.012), and beta=0.23 (p=0.021
) respectively). More complaints consistent with peripheral neuropathy (p=0
.004), complaints about equilibrium (p=0.015), and complaints about concent
ration ability (p=0.053) were found in the group exposed to Cd than in the
control group, and these variables correlated positively with CdUmax (perip
heral neuropathy: beta=0.38, p<0.001; equilibrium: beta=0.22, p=0.057; conc
entration ability: beta=0.27, p=0.020).
Conclusion-Slowing of visuomotor functioning on neurobehavioural testing an
d increase in complaints consistent with peripheral neuropathy, complaints
about equilibrium, and complaints about concentration ability were dose dep
endently associated with CdU. Age, exposure to other neurotoxicants, or sta
tus of renal function could not explain these findings. The present study a
lso indicates that an excess of complaints may be detected in Cd workers be
fore signs of microproteinuria induced by Cd occur.