METHODS FOR COMPARING SPATIAL VARIABILITY PATTERNS OF MILLET YIELD AND SOIL DATA

Citation
A. Stein et al., METHODS FOR COMPARING SPATIAL VARIABILITY PATTERNS OF MILLET YIELD AND SOIL DATA, Soil Science Society of America journal, 61(3), 1997, pp. 861-870
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Soil Science
ISSN journal
03615995
Volume
61
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
861 - 870
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-5995(1997)61:3<861:MFCSVP>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
This paper investigates methods to compare spatial patterns of pearl m illet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] yield with spatial patterns of soil variables in a farmer's 1-ha field on an undulating sand plain in Niger near ICRISAT-SC. Spatial pattern comparisons are important for precision farming applications. Methods included the correlation coeff icient, linear regression, a distance measure to compare separate maps and the cross-correlation function. Millet grain yield varied from 0 to 2885 kg ha(-1) on 5 by 5 m sub-plots. Pearl millet yield was correl ated with measured soil variables at three different depths, elevation , and crust formation for two successive years. Only 30% of the total variation in millet dry yield was explained by regressing yield agains t soil variables. Detrended elevation showed a significant negative re lation with yield (r = -0.421). The cation-exchange capacity (CEC) at all the depths showed a significant negative relation with yield (r of -0.238 to -0.290) because crusting and erosion increase with CEC exte nding to distances up to 30 to 40 m. Pattern comparison using the cros s-correlogram related local hillocks in the area with high yields and local dips with low yields at a distance of 15 to 20 m. From this stud y, we concluded that the cross-correlogram was beneficial to compare d ata at various distances. Yield patterns are best explained by soil va riables related to erosion as the major determining factor in the area .