The last half-century of psychiatric services as reflected in Psychiatric Services

Authors
Citation
Jl. Geller, The last half-century of psychiatric services as reflected in Psychiatric Services, PSYCH SERV, 51(1), 2000, pp. 41-67
Citations number
481
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,"Clinical Psycology & Psychiatry
Journal title
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES
ISSN journal
10752730 → ACNP
Volume
51
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
41 - 67
Database
ISI
SICI code
1075-2730(200001)51:1<41:TLHOPS>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
The last half-century of psychiatric services in the United States is exami ned through developments and trends reported in the 50 years of publication of Psychiatric Services. The journal, earlier named. Mental Hospitals and then Hospital and Community Psychiatry, was launched by the American Psychi atric Association in January 1950 and marks its 50th anniversary this year. The author organizes his review of psychiatric services largely around the locus of cure and treatment because the location of treatment-institution versus community-has been the battleground for the ideology of care and for the crystallization of policy and legal reform,He uses "dehospitalization" to describe the movement of patients out of state hospitals, rejecting the widely used term "deinstitutionalization" as inappropriate; one reason is that the term wrongly implies that many settings where patients ended up we re not institutional. Also covered in detail, as reflected in the journal, are community care and treatment, economics, patient empowerment, and the i nterface issues of general hospitals, outpatient commitment, and psychosoci al rehabilitation. The author notes that some concepts, such as outpatient commitment and! patient empowerment, emerged earlier than now assumed, and that others, like psychosocial rehabilitation, recurred in slightly differe nt forms over time. He concludes that even after 50 years of moving patient s out of state hospitals and putting them somewhere else, mental health pol icymakers and practitioners remain too myopically focused on the locus of c are and treatment instead of on the humaneness, effectiveness, and quality of care.