As. Allal et al., THE IMPACT OF TREATMENT FACTORS ON LOCAL-CONTROL IN T2-T3 ANAL CARCINOMAS TREATED BY RADIOTHERAPY WITH OR WITHOUT CHEMOTHERAPY, Cancer, 79(12), 1997, pp. 2329-2335
BACKGROUND, This study was conducted to investigate the influence of t
herapeutic parameters on local control (LC) in the sphincter-conservin
g treatment of T2-T3 anal carcinoma. METHODS, From 1976 to 1993, 137 p
atients with anal carcinoma classified as T2 (85 patients) or T3 (52 p
atients) were treated curatively by radiotherapy (RT) alone (54 patien
ts) or by concomitant chemotherapy and RT (83 patients). RT was delive
red in two sequences, with a median gap of 46 days between the sequenc
es. The first sequence was delivered at a median dose of 39.6 gray (Gy
) using megavoltage photon beams. Boost treatment consisted of either
Ir-192 implantation or external beam RT (median dose, 20 Gy). Chemothe
rapy started on Day 1 and generally consisted of 1 cycle of mitomycin
C (10 mg/m(2)) and a 5-day infusion of 5-fluorouracil (600-800 mg/m(2)
/day). For surviving patients, median follow-up was 83 months. Univari
ate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine therapeutic
parameters affecting LC after adjustment for clinical factors. RESULTS
, The 5-year actuarial LC was 76%. Factors associated with poorer LC (
univariate) were as follows: age < 66 years (LC was 67% with the facto
r vs. 85% without), male gender (65% vs. 81%), tumor extent > 1/3 cana
l circumference (67% vs. 90%), lymph node involvement (64% vs. 81%), u
se of external beam boost (62% vs. 79%), and overall treatment time (O
TT) greater than or equal to 75 days (69% vs. 85%). In multivariate an
alysis, no therapeutic parameters remained significant when adjusted f
or significant clinical factors, although OTT was of borderline signif
icance (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS, The results of this multivariate analy
sis suggest that therapeutic factors have a less marked effect on LC c
ompared with clinical parameters; the only factor that appeared to hav
e some effect was OTT. Efforts to improve LC in patients with poor pro
gnoses should concentrate on optimizing OTT and the chemotherapeutic a
spects of treatment (in other words, attempts should be made to provid
e more effective agents and optimize scheduling). (C) 1997 American Ca
ncer Society.