Chest radiograph and computed tomography are the most appropriate imaging t
ools for detecting asbestos-related pleural and parenchymal disease due to
their availability and performances. The cost and irradiation delivery of c
onventional chest X-rays are limited. Technical parameters and reading shou
ld be standardized. Digital chest radiograph will progressively replace con
ventional techniques but technical standards and performance data are lacki
ng. Computed tomography, using spiral or conventional mode, explores the wh
ole lung and pleura. High resolution computed tomography samples both lung
and pleura but its sensitivity for parenchymal fibrosis detection is greate
r Several methods cart be employed and should be recommended to reduce radi
ation dose in spiral and high resolution computed tomography. Computed tomo
graphy is more sensitive and specific than chest radiograph in early detect
ion of pleural plaques and parenchymal fibrosis but is not infallible. The
error reading rate of chest radiograph for early detection of bronchial car
cinoma is high. Computed tomography is more sensitive but lacks specificity
, and leads to detect a high rate of lesions the relation to asbestos expos
ure of which are difficult to establish. No scientific data are available t
o assess the contribution of imaging in early detection of mesothelioma.