From the end of the 17(th) century onwards an awareness had been developing
in Mexican culture of the importance of the pre-Colombian past and the nat
ive world. This had influenced the best minds in Mexico, Siguenza y Gongora
, Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz, Pedro Marquez. 19(th) century academic art, in
fact, be it classical or romantic, also brought to light in its own way th
e ancient native world, but there was a stiffness, a rhetoric, about it, ra
ther than a real awareness of the cultural role which such a world had in t
he past or might have in the present. In the age after the Revolution, the
political and cultural agitation had also made much of the native world and
it became a requisite of art that it should interpret that which had deep
roots in the native community, albeit with a certain ambiguity in its attit
ude. Diego Riviera was one of the artists who took on this role, planning a
"national art" which was soon to become for him an art with an ideological
function, i.e. which was to have not only a national and social role, but
also a political one. Mural art, of which the painter was one of the most w
ell-known exponents, became the most original form of propaganda, the publi
c instrument by means of which the social Utopia of the artist was to be re
vealed. The "native" became for Rivera a vehicle of certain values, but at
the same time a recipient of that cultural reelaboration which should have
helped it to developed so as to integrate itself into a nation which was ch
anging and recovering its spirit. In Rivera's poetry, the stress laid on th
e past was the way to delineate the future of his country. Nostalgia for a
pre-Colombian world apparently supplied him with a paradigm, foreshadowing
a future society. In thirty years mural activity in Mexico and the United S
tates he projected - albeit with a certain discontinuity (his vision of the
world and his vision of art, in total opposition - more theoretical than r
eal) to the "corrupt theories" of bourgeois art.