Av. Ershov et al., Late Cenozoic burial history and dynamics of the Northern Caucasus molassebasin: implications for foreland basin modelling, TECTONOPHYS, 313(1-2), 1999, pp. 219-241
The collisional history of the Caucasus segment of the Alpine-Himalayan fol
d belt started at the end of the Eocene. The associated development of the
Northern Caucasus foreland basin occurred during two syn-collisional stages
, each displaying different subsidence patterns. The 34-16 Ma (Maikopian or
pre-foreland stage) displays a long-wavelength subsidence of a broad area
whereas the 16-0 Ma (foreland stage) displays asymmetrical foreland subside
nce. The first is correlated with the termination of subduction in the sout
hern area and can be associated with mantle flow induced by the re-equilibr
ation of the subducted slab. The along-strike configuration of the second,
molasse basin, stage contradicts the hypothesis in which topographical load
ing is considered to be the main control on foreland subsidence. There is a
clear anti-correlation between basin depths and orogen heights: the deepes
t parts of the basin are at the tips of the orogen, where mountain heights
are negligible while the area adjacent to the highest mountains (Central Ca
ucasus) is uplifted. The influence of other types of loading in foreland ba
sin development has therefore been investigated and it has been possible to
find a good fit with both gravity and basin architecture by including only
two additional model parameters into the model. These are crustal and lith
ospheric thickening/thinning The results demonstrate that crustal thickenin
g and removal of Lithospheric roots are responsible for supporting the high
Central Caucasus Mountains and uplift of adjacent areas. The subsidence of
the basins at the orogen tips is explained by loading of Lithospheric root
s. Both effects are important in the geographically intermediate areas. in
general, it is concluded that topography should not be considered as the ma
in control on foreland subsidence, but only as one of several counterbalanc
ing mechanisms. The existing flexural model therefore needs improvements su
ch that it can be related directly to 'subsurface loading' by real structur
es and processes during collision. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All right
s reserved.