One of the best options for handling Mexico City's 74.5 m(3)/s of wastewate
r is to use advanced primary treatment (APT), filter and disinfect the effl
uent before it is reused in agriculture. The final effluent must contain le
ss than helminth egg (HE) per liter and less than 1000 fecal coliforms (MPN
)/100 mL while still retaining nutrients and organic matter for their agron
omic benefits. Sand and synthetic filters were tested on the effluent of a
12 L/s pilot APT plant. The average APT effluent concentration of helminth
eggs was 1.2 HE/L and both fillers produced effluent concentrations ranging
from 0 to 0.52 HE/L. Although the removal efficiencies of the sand and syn
thetic filters were similar, the synthetic filter had several important adv
antages over the sand filter: (a) The filtration rate of the synthetic filt
er was more than 5.8 times that of the sand filter and the production rate
per run per al ea was 2.1 times than of the sand filler. (b) The synthetic
filter required less than 1% of the raw wastewater for backwashing, while t
he sand filler required twice as much filtered wastewater. Although, the sy
nthetic filter has higher capital costs and has a more complex design and o
peration, the overall costs would most likely be lower due to its higher pr
oduction rate. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.