Inhibitory effects of dauricine on potassium currents in guinea pig ventricular myocytes

Citation
Js. Xia et al., Inhibitory effects of dauricine on potassium currents in guinea pig ventricular myocytes, ACT PHAR SI, 21(1), 2000, pp. 60-64
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA SINICA
ISSN journal
02539756 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
60 - 64
Database
ISI
SICI code
0253-9756(200001)21:1<60:IEODOP>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
AIM: To study the effects of dauricine(Dau) an the rapidly activating compo nent (I-Kr), the slowly activating component (I-Ks) Of the delayed rectifie r potassium: current, and the inward rectifier potassium current ( I-K1 ) i n guinea pig ventricular myocytes. METhODS: Single myocytes were dissociate d by enzymatic dissociation method. The currents were recorded with the who le-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique. RESULTS: (1) Dau 1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 mu mol.L-1 blocked I-Kr and tail current (IKr-tail) in a co ncentration-dependent manner. The IC50 for block of IKr-tail was 16 (95 % c onfidence limits: 13 - 22) mu mol.L-1 The time constant of IKr-tail deactiv ation was (140 +/- 38) ms in the control and (130 +/- 26) ms in the presenc e of Dau 30 mu mol.L-1(n = 6 cells from 3 animals, P > 0.05). (2) Dau 1 - 1 00 mu mol.L-1 Produced concentration-dependent blocks of I-Ks and tail The IC50 value for block of IKs-tail was 33 (95 % confidence limits: 24 - 46) m u mol.L-1 The time constant of IKs-tail deactivation was (92 +/- 18) ms in the control and (84 +/- 16) ms in the presence of Dau 30 mu mol.L-1(n = 8 c ells from 4 animals, P > 0.05). (3) Addition of Dau 30 mu mol.L-1 induced b lock of I-Ks and IKs-tail (n = 7 cells from 3 animals). The degree of block of IK, and IKs-tail depended on test potentials, increasing with more posi tive depolarizations. (4) Dau 20 mu mol.L-1 blocked mainly inward component of I-K1 and reduced the reversal potential from -72 mV (control) to - 78 m V ( n = 6 cells from 3 animals). CONCLUSION: (1) Dau inhibited I-Ks, but no t the process of IKs deactivation. (2) Dan blocked I-Kr, but not the proces s of deactivation. (3) Dau had a blocking effect on I-K1.