Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with ropivacaine 0.2% versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after major shoulder surgery - Effects on diaphragmatic and respiratory function
A. Borgeat et al., Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with ropivacaine 0.2% versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after major shoulder surgery - Effects on diaphragmatic and respiratory function, ANESTHESIOL, 92(1), 2000, pp. 102-108
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Background: The authors compared the effects of patient-controlled intersca
lene analgesia (PCIA) with ropivacaine 0.2% and patient-controlled intraven
ous analgesia (PCIVA) with opioids on hemidiaphragmatic excursion and respi
ratory function after major shoulder surgery.
Methods: Thirty-five patients scheduled for elective major shoulder surgery
were prospectively randomized to receive either PCM or PCIVA. All patients
received an interscalene block before surgery. In the PCIA group, a cathet
er was introduced between the anterior and middle scalene muscles. Six hour
s after the initial block, patients received for 48 h either a continuous i
nfusion of 0.2% ropivacaine through the interscalene catheter at a rate of
5 ml/h plus a bolus dose of 3 or 4 mi with a lockout time of 20 min (PCIA g
roup) or a continuous intravenous infusion of nicomorphine at a rate or 0.5
mg/h plus a bolus dose of 2 or 3 mg with a lockout time of 20 min (PCIVA g
roup). Hemidiaphragmatic excursion and respiratory function were assessed w
ith the patient in a 45 degrees semirecumbent position the day before the o
peration and 20 min (in the operating room), 24 h, and 48 h after the initi
al block by means of ultrasonography and spirometry, respectively. Pain rel
ief was regularly assessed, side effects were noted, and patient satisfacti
on was rated 6 h after the end of the study.
Results: Hemidiaphragmatic excursion was similar in the two groups 20 min a
fter interscalene block. Hemidiaphragmatic excursion was increased in the P
CIA group on the nonoperated side 24 and 48 h after the interscalene block(
P < 0.05). Pulmonary function was similar in the two groups at each time, P
ain was better controlled in the PCIA group at 12 and 24 h (P < 0.05). The
incidence of nausea and vomiting were 5.5% results 60% for the PCIA and PCN
A groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was greater in the
PCIA group (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: The use of PCIA or PCIVA techniques to provide analgesia after
major shoulder surgery is associated with similar effects on respiratory f
unction, In the PCIA group, hemidiaphragmatic excursion showed a significan
tly greater amplitude 24 and 48 h after the initial block on the nonoperate
d side, The PCIA technique provided better pain control, a lower incidence
of side effects, and a higher degree of patient satisfaction.