Evaluation of established rheumatoid arthritis

Citation
Am. Van Gestel et G. Stucki, Evaluation of established rheumatoid arthritis, BEST PR R C, 13(4), 1999, pp. 629-644
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Rheumatology
Journal title
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
15216942 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
629 - 644
Database
ISI
SICI code
1521-6942(199912)13:4<629:EOERA>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
There are two major aspects to evaluate in patients with established RA, na mely (i) the state or progress of the disease, and (ii) the effects of spec ific interventions. The evaluation should include reliable, valid and sensi tive measures of disease activity, tissue damage and health status. It is i mportant to recognise that measures of disease activity can be influenced b y tissue damage as well. Also, in established RA, health status is likely t o be influenced by both disease activity and tissue damage. Whether current rules concerning improvement or remission, which were developed in the con text of early RA, can be applied to established disease has to be investiga ted. While use of radiographs is the current standard method of assessing d amage in established RA, range-of-motion measures and muscle strength indic es may be a more practical and an equally valid alternative. When selecting health status instruments one should carefully explore and pretest possibl e health status measures for specific clinical or study settings.