Ifosfamide given by continuous-intravenous infusion in association with vinorelbine in patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer: A phase I-II clinical trial

Citation
C. Campisi et al., Ifosfamide given by continuous-intravenous infusion in association with vinorelbine in patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer: A phase I-II clinical trial, CANC CHEMOT, 44, 1999, pp. S1-S4
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
ISSN journal
03445704 → ACNP
Volume
44
Year of publication
1999
Supplement
S
Pages
S1 - S4
Database
ISI
SICI code
0344-5704(199910)44:<S1:IGBCII>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Background: Vinorelbine (VNR) is highly active in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and has shown an overall response rate of 40%-50% as first-line treat ment. In vitro,a synergy has been observed between this drug and ifosfamide (IFX). In addition, the pharmacokinetics of IFX suggest that it may have g reater activity when given by continuous-intravenous infusion (C.I.V.I.). T he aim of this study was therefore to assess the antitumor efficacy and tox icity of the combination of bolus VNR and C.I.V.I. IFX as second-line thera py in anthracycline-resistant breast cancer patients. Patients ann methods: Forty-two patients with MBC who had already received anthracycline-based c hemotherapy were treated with a regimen consisting of IFX, by C.I.V.I. for 72 hours and bolus VNR. The courses were repeated every three weeks for a m aximum of eight cycles. Four dose intensification steps were planned. IFX, 1.5 g/m(2) on days 1-3 + VNR, 30 mg/m(2) on day 1 (six patients); IFX, 2 g/ m(2) on days 1-3 + VNR, 25 mg/m(2) on day 1 (six patients); IFX, 1.8 g/m(2) on days 1-3 + VNR, 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (six patients); IFX, 2 g/m(2 ) on days 1-3 + VNR, 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (24 patients). Sodium-2-mer captoethane sulfonate (mesna) was associated with IFX at an infusion ratio of 1:1 and, once the infusion was completed, per os every four hours for th ree times. Results: All of the 42 patients entered were assessable for toxi city, and 41 of them for response. Neutropenia was the most frequently-occu rring toxicity, but only five patients at the highest dose level (11.9%) pr esented grade 4, and none of those at the first three steps. Other signific ant toxic effects were mild (only grade I-II). The median relative dose int ensity was 95% at the highest dose level and all the treatments were admini stered on an out-patient basis. The overall response rate was 36.5% with a CR rate of 4.8% (two of 41 patients, all at the highest dose level) and a P R rate of 31.7% (13 of 41 patients). The median response duration was 7.0 m onths (range 2-13 months). Conclusions: The present phase I-II study shows that the IFX and VNR combination is an active and well-tolerated treatment in MBC and provides an alternative to taxanes for patients previously treat ed with anthracyclines.