This article compares and contrasts the way a set of fundamental issues are
treated in social representations theory and discursive psychology. These
are: action, representation, communication, cognition, construction, episte
mology and method. In each case we indicate arguments for the discursive ps
ychological treatment. These arguments are then developed and illustrated t
hrough a discussion of Wagner, Duveen, Themel and Verma (1999) which highli
ghts in particular the way the analysis fails to address the activities don
e by people when they are producing representations, and the epistemologica
l troubles that arise from failing to address the role of the researcher's
own representations.