Where gas and hydro are not available and power capacity needs to be expand
ed, the choice will be between coal and nuclear, for there are few viable a
lternative options. This paper analyzes the factors that will determine the
choice. The internal costs of power generation using coal and nuclear show
no clear edge for one or the other. A tilt in favor of nuclear emerges whe
n the external costs, as assessed by experts in the field, are added to the
internal ones. Laymen's evaluations of the external costs appear to be at
least an order of magnitude higher than the expert assessments, however. Gi
ven their high level and strong influence on energy policy making, these ev
aluations will ultimately determine the choice. But since the laymen's view
s in this regard are formed in an unsystematic manner and are unstable over
time, it is not possible to use economic analysis to determine what that c
hoice will be.