Coal or nuclear in new power stations: The political economy of an undesirable but necessary choice

Authors
Citation
M. Radetzki, Coal or nuclear in new power stations: The political economy of an undesirable but necessary choice, ENERGY J, 21(1), 2000, pp. 135-147
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Economics,"Environmental Engineering & Energy
Journal title
ENERGY JOURNAL
ISSN journal
01956574 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
135 - 147
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-6574(2000)21:1<135:CONINP>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Where gas and hydro are not available and power capacity needs to be expand ed, the choice will be between coal and nuclear, for there are few viable a lternative options. This paper analyzes the factors that will determine the choice. The internal costs of power generation using coal and nuclear show no clear edge for one or the other. A tilt in favor of nuclear emerges whe n the external costs, as assessed by experts in the field, are added to the internal ones. Laymen's evaluations of the external costs appear to be at least an order of magnitude higher than the expert assessments, however. Gi ven their high level and strong influence on energy policy making, these ev aluations will ultimately determine the choice. But since the laymen's view s in this regard are formed in an unsystematic manner and are unstable over time, it is not possible to use economic analysis to determine what that c hoice will be.