The official method for the detection of genetically modified soybeans (German Food Act LMBG 35): a semi-quantitative study of sensitivity limits with glyphosate-tolerant soybeans (Roundup Ready) and insect-resistant Bt maize (Maximizer)
A. Jankiewicz et al., The official method for the detection of genetically modified soybeans (German Food Act LMBG 35): a semi-quantitative study of sensitivity limits with glyphosate-tolerant soybeans (Roundup Ready) and insect-resistant Bt maize (Maximizer), EUR FOOD RE, 209(2), 1999, pp. 77-82
The aim of the study was to settle a concent for the standardised descripti
on of the potency of a PCR setup with respect to the detection limit. The m
ain terms used are the theoretical detection limit (L-theor) and the practi
cal detection limit (L-prac). These detection limits were determined for th
e example of two current PCR setups for the detection of genetically modifi
ed soybeans and maize. The Ltheor for the detection of Roundup Ready soybea
n DNA with the PCR setup applied was 0.005% genetically modified organism (
GMO)/non-GMO (w/w) (corresponding to 30 copies of the GMO soya genome per s
ingle PCR reaction). In pre-mixed powder preparations (certified reference
materials, CRMs) of soya it was possible to detect 0.1% GMO/non-GMO (w/w),
i.e. this was the L-prac. The Ltheor for Bt maize was 0.005% GMO/non-GMO (w
/w), that corresponded to 9 calculated genome copies per single reaction. W
ithout background DNA, as few as 2 genome copies (0.01 ng GMO DNA) were cle
arly detectable. As for soybeans, the L-prac of the available CRMs from tra
nsgenic and conventional maize was 0.1% GMO/non-GMO (w/w). Quantitative sys
tems for the investigation of foodstuffs are still not available as officia
l methods, and are still being developed. Determining L-theor and L-prac va
lues could be important for setting limits for the GMO contents of foods, w
hen deciding whether they should be labelled. Concerning labelling limits,
it is obvious that the PCR setups investigated have more sensitive detectio
n thresholds than the limits under discussion for the labelling of foodstuf
fs as "genetically modified".