Objectives: to compare the amputation rates, quality of life and health cav
e costs in patients receiving duplex ultrasound scanning against clinical s
urveillance following femoropopliteal and femorocrural vein bypass.
Design: multi-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial.
Methods: 1200 patients with a patent vein graft at 30 days postoperatively
will be randomised to either clinical or duplex follow-up. All patients are
seen in an out-patient clinic at 6 weeks, then 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months p
ostoperatively. At each appointment patients are examined clinically; palpa
ble pulses in the graft and crural vessels, presenting symptoms and their a
nkle-branchial pressure indices (ABPIs) measured. In the duplex group only,
the results of the scan are monitored. The incidence of radiological and/o
r surgical interventions throughout the follow-up period are also noted. Qu
ality of life is measured using the SF-36 and EuroQol questionnaires at the
6 and 18 month appointments. Hospital stays and resource use are documente
d for health economic analysis.
Results: the primary endpoint of this study is amputation or death from vas
cular causes; however, graft patency rates will also be compared between th
e groups. Quality of life and health economic data will be used to determin
e if there is any benefit in either arm in these outcomes between follow-up
strategies.
Conclusions: this large, randomised-controlled trial will hopefully provide
direct evidence on the benefit of duplex surveillance for vein grafts in t
er ms of limb salvage, quality of life of the patients and cost-benefit to
the pur chaser.