Comparison of the classical manual pushed wedge films, with an improved automated method for making blood smears

Citation
L. Benattar et G. Flandrin, Comparison of the classical manual pushed wedge films, with an improved automated method for making blood smears, HEM CELL TH, 41(5), 1999, pp. 211-215
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology,"Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
HEMATOLOGY AND CELL THERAPY
ISSN journal
12693286 → ACNP
Volume
41
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
211 - 215
Database
ISI
SICI code
1269-3286(199911)41:5<211:COTCMP>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Comparison of apparatus for automatically spreading peripheral blood films (GENES) to manual wedge-pull technique has been performed, showing that the average size of optimal area for counting is twice larger in automated sme ars compared to manual ones. The variability of WBC repartition has been st udied in doing differential count on manual and automated smears and both a re compared to results obtain with an independent technique (Coulter STKS) for differential. The correlation coefficients for each WBC population show a closer relationship between automated smear preparations and reference i nstrument (STKS) than with manual spreading smears. Monocyte differential i s particularly influenced by the variability of manual spreading procedures .